
Mayfield's Economics Blog
Economics, as a branch of the more general theory of human action, deals with all human action, i.e., with mans purposive aiming at the attainment of ends chosen, whatever these ends may be.--Ludwig von Mises
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Monday, January 30, 2012
Personal Consumption Expenditures

PCE decreased less than 0.1% in December, and real PCE decreased 0.1%. Note: The PCE price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.2 percent.The personal saving rate was at 4.0% in December.
| Reactions: |
Friday, January 27, 2012
Home Sales
2011 was the worst year for new home sales since the Census Bureau started tracking sales in 1963. The three worst years were 2011, 2010, and 2009 - and 2008 is also on the worst ten list.
Labels:
home sales
| Reactions: |
4th Quarter 2011: 2.8% Growth
This is the first of three estimates for the period and marks the best growth rate in a year-and-a-half following a reading of 1.8 percent in the third quarter. But, don’t be surprised if the most recent data is revised lower since downward revisions have been the norm in recent quarters, the third quarter data starting out at a similar level – a 2.5 percent rate – when it was initially reported.source
Labels:
economic growth,
real GDP
| Reactions: |
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Federal Share of State Spending

State officials have become addicted to federal subsidies because they allow them to spend money taken from taxpayers across the country instead of having to ask their voters to pony up the funds. As the following charts shows, total state spending continued to increase during the economic downturn because the federal government picked up the slack. Note that the federal share of total state spending went from 25.7 percent in 2001 to 34.1 percent in 2011.
Labels:
federal spending,
state budgets
| Reactions: |
Monday, January 23, 2012
Friday, January 20, 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Gold: Bull or Bear?

Gold set a record on September 5 at $1,895 an ounce (London PM Fix) and to date has fallen as low as $1,531 (December 29), a decline of 19.2%. In order to determine how long it might take to breach $1,895 again, I measured how long it took new highs to be mounted after big corrections in the past....
Once gold breaches its old high, you'll probably never be able to buy it at current prices again.
That's a rather obvious statement, but let it sink in. Buying now at $1,600 and then watching the price fall to, say, $1,500, wouldn't be fun – but it'll probably hit $2,000 or higher before the year's over, never to visit the $1,600s again this cycle. If that turns out to be correct, the next four months will be the very last time you can buy at these levels. You'll have to pay a higher price from then on.
That's a rather obvious statement, but let it sink in. Buying now at $1,600 and then watching the price fall to, say, $1,500, wouldn't be fun – but it'll probably hit $2,000 or higher before the year's over, never to visit the $1,600s again this cycle. If that turns out to be correct, the next four months will be the very last time you can buy at these levels. You'll have to pay a higher price from then on.
Labels:
gold,
gold prices
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Debt to GDP Ratio
Often pundits will say that our current debt to GDP ratio is not unreasonable because it is not too high relative to the period following the WWII and the Great Depression.It is true that during the post WWII era, government spending exceeded GDP. Nevermind that FDR’s New Deal actually prolonged the Great Depression. And ignore the fact that despite conventional wisdom, World War II did nothing to create prosperity. As Bob Higgs has argued extensively, no amount of money pumped into a depressed economy can bring about genuine economic recovery unless investors and business leaders feel secure in their property rights.
source
Labels:
national debt
| Reactions: |
Monday, January 16, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
Thursday, January 12, 2012
How to Measure Defense Spending?
“Defense spending at lowest levels in 60 years”:

In fact, Pentagon spending in real, inflation-adjusted dollars has roughly doubled since 2000 and is up about 50 percent since 1970, at the height of the Vietnam War.

In fact, Pentagon spending in real, inflation-adjusted dollars has roughly doubled since 2000 and is up about 50 percent since 1970, at the height of the Vietnam War.
Labels:
defense spending
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
North Dakota Oil Production
North Dakota's oil production has now surpassed OPEC-member Ecuador's daily production of 485,000 barrels. As a result of the ongoing oil boom in the Bakken area, North Dakota continues to lead the nation with the lowest state unemployment rate at 3.4% for November, more than 5 full percentage points below the nation's average 8.7% rate for November. There are nine North Dakota counties with jobless rates at or below 2% for November, and Williams County, which is at the center of the Bakken oil boom, boasts the lowest county jobless rate in the country at 0.9%.
source
Note: The US consumes about 19,000,000 barrels a day.
Labels:
North Dakota,
oil,
oil reserves
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Monday, January 9, 2012
Friday, January 6, 2012
December 2011 Unemployment: 8.5%

After holding steady at about 9 percent during most of 2011, the jobless rate has now declined by 0.6 percentage points in just the last three months as the number of unemployed persons has fallen from 13.9 million to 13.1 million. During that same time, the size of the labor force has decreased from 154.0 million to 153.9 million, reducing the participation rate from 64.1 percent to 64.0 percent.
A broader measure of job distress – U6 underemployment that includes discouraged workers and those settling for part-time work – fell from 15.6 percent to 15.2 percent, down from a high of nearly 17 percent earlier in the year.
Labels:
unemployment,
unemployment rate
| Reactions: |
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Walter Williams on Greed
Walter Williams writes:
read the entire essay
What human motivation gets the most wonderful things done? It's really a silly question, because the answer is so simple. It turns out that it's human greed that gets the most wonderful things done. When I say greed, I am not talking about fraud, theft, dishonesty, lobbying for special privileges from government or other forms of despicable behavior. I'm talking about people trying to get as much as they can for themselves...
Free market capitalism is relatively new in human history. Prior to the rise of capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving one's fellow man. Capitalists seek to discover what people want and then produce it as efficiently as possible. Free market capitalism is ruthless in its profit and loss discipline. This explains much of the hostility toward free market capitalism; some of it is held by businessmen...
Free market capitalism has other enemies — mostly among the intellectual elite and political tyrants. These are people who believe that they have superior wisdom to the masses and that God has ordained them to forcibly impose that wisdom on the rest of us. Of course, they have what they consider to be good reasons for restricting liberty, but every tyrant who has ever lived has had what he considered good reason for restricting liberty. A tyrant's agenda calls for the attenuation or the elimination of the market and what is implied by it — voluntary exchange. Tyrants do not trust that people acting voluntarily will do what the tyrant thinks they should do. They want to replace the market with economic planning and regulation.
read the entire essay
Labels:
greed,
self-interest,
Walter Williams
| Reactions: |
Monday, January 2, 2012
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Free Trade Works: Japanese Auto Edition

1. Japanese automakers like Toyota, Honda, and Nissan are responsible for more than 407,000 jobs in the U.S. The vast majority of employees are those working at Japanese auto dealerships in the U.S., but Japanese automakers employ 50,000 American workers at 29 American vehicle, engine and parts plants, and another 4,000 at 34 major R&D and design centers, reflecting $34 billion of investment in the U.S.
2. Japanese makers are producing most of the cars they sell in America in North America -- 68% altogether.
3. Exported vehicles from Japanese plants in the U.S. last year increased to more than 145,000, up from 94,000 in 2009. With a strong yen today, the trend will continue, and will be be supplemented by new exports of U.S.-built Toyotas to South Korea following the recent ratification of the free trade agreement.
Labels:
automobile industry,
free trade,
international trade,
Japan
| Reactions: |
Economic Recovery: A Solution
Bill Bonner writes:
read the entire essay
Trying to fix a depression it is not only expensive…. The US government spends $1.60 for every $1 it receives in taxes. This is a recipe for a disaster, not for a recovery.
Worse. It actually prevents a real recovery from happening, by blocking the market’s natural self-healing system
Let us ask you this, dear reader: what’s the cure for a depression?
Answer: a depression!...
The unemployment problem is a “tough nut to crack,” says The Financial Times.
Of course, we could fix the jobless problem overnight. But people wouldn’t appreciate it. We would simply remove all subsidies for unemployed people…and all restraints on hiring. Labor prices would fall fast. Within days, we’d have full employment again.
read the entire essay
Labels:
Bill Bonner
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Regime Uncertainty and the Non-Recovery
Robert Higgs introduced the concept of “regime uncertainty”, government policies and actions that threaten property rights, in his outstanding paper, Regime Uncertainty: Why the Great Depression Lasted So Long and Why Prosperity Resumed after the War to explain the depth and duration of the Great Depression with special attention to the “Roosevelt recession” of 1937 to 1938, a recession within a depression. Commentators have applied the concept to predict or explain why the current recovery would be, or is, a slow jobless recovery.
As examples see:
http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae13_3_4.pdf
http://blog.independent.org/2011/11/06/u-s-economic-recovery-remains-anemic-at-best/
http://blog.independent.org/2011/10/08/important-new-evidence-on-regime-uncertainty/
http://blog.independent.org/2011/09/19/global-regime-uncertainty/
http://blog.mises.org/11716/jobs-investment-and-spending/
Today’s Wall Street Journal, “Regulation for Dummies” (p. A20) provides more evidence that regime uncertainty is a major factor in leading forward looking entrepreneurs and managers to be hesitant to expand old or create new enterprises. The evidence is provided in this chart (below) reproduced in the Journal from the Unified Agenda, Regulatory Service Center.
The Journal observes, it is not just existing or newly approved regulations that matter. “(T)he regulatory future matters as much. The Administration’s pipeline is clogged with proposed rules and plans to propose rules, which every business survey says are contributing to the policy uncertainty that is harming growth and hiring.”
Echoing Higgs, the Journal concludes, “The evidence is overwhelming that the Obama regulatory surge is one reason the current economic recovery has been so lackluster by historical standards. Rather than nurture an economy trying to rebuild confidence after a financial heart attack, the Administration pushed through its now-famous blitz of liberal policies on health care, financial services, energy, housing, education and student loans, telecom, labor relations, transportation and probably some other industries we’ve forgotten. Anyone who thinks this has only minimal impact on business has never been in business.” What should be added to the list is the real threat of significantly higher future tax burdens.
source
As examples see:
http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae13_3_4.pdf
http://blog.independent.org/2011/11/06/u-s-economic-recovery-remains-anemic-at-best/
http://blog.independent.org/2011/10/08/important-new-evidence-on-regime-uncertainty/
http://blog.independent.org/2011/09/19/global-regime-uncertainty/
http://blog.mises.org/11716/jobs-investment-and-spending/
Today’s Wall Street Journal, “Regulation for Dummies” (p. A20) provides more evidence that regime uncertainty is a major factor in leading forward looking entrepreneurs and managers to be hesitant to expand old or create new enterprises. The evidence is provided in this chart (below) reproduced in the Journal from the Unified Agenda, Regulatory Service Center.
The Journal observes, it is not just existing or newly approved regulations that matter. “(T)he regulatory future matters as much. The Administration’s pipeline is clogged with proposed rules and plans to propose rules, which every business survey says are contributing to the policy uncertainty that is harming growth and hiring.”
Echoing Higgs, the Journal concludes, “The evidence is overwhelming that the Obama regulatory surge is one reason the current economic recovery has been so lackluster by historical standards. Rather than nurture an economy trying to rebuild confidence after a financial heart attack, the Administration pushed through its now-famous blitz of liberal policies on health care, financial services, energy, housing, education and student loans, telecom, labor relations, transportation and probably some other industries we’ve forgotten. Anyone who thinks this has only minimal impact on business has never been in business.” What should be added to the list is the real threat of significantly higher future tax burdens.
source
Labels:
economic recovery,
regime uncertainty,
Robert Higgs
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Revenues, Taxes, and Government Growth

This chart contrasts total federal revenues with the portion that comes from individual income tax receipts. Here we see that the biggest source or rising tax revenues has been income taxes, since they have risen at a much faster rate. One reason for the sluggish growth in total revenues, of course, is the cut in social security withholding rates that has been in place for the past year and is quite likely to be continued. The chart also highlights the fact that since the Bush tax cuts were first instituted in mid-2003, income tax receipts are now substantially higher—36% higher (almost $300 billion on an annual basis)—than they were when tax rates were higher. Once again, we see here concrete evidence that Art Laffer's vision (and his famous curve) was anything but crazy: lower tax rates can promote stronger growth, and thus result in higher tax revenues. If it weren't for the 20080-9 recession, which had everything to do with a collapse of the housing bubble and a 6 million decline in the number of private sector jobs, and almost nothing to do with low tax rates, both the economy and tax revenues would now be considerably higher.
lots of graphs and more analysis
My thoughts: Looking at the chart it should be obvious that the recession lowered tax revenues, not "the Bush tax cut".
Labels:
big government,
individual taxes,
tax revenues
| Reactions: |
8% Unemployment by November 2012?
Many forecasters think the unemployment rate will increase next year because of sluggish growth. Right now the FOMC is forecasting the unemployment rate will be in the 8.5% to 8.7% range in Q4 2012, and private forecasters are even more pessimistic. Goldman Sachs is forecasting 9% in Q4 2012, and Merrill Lynch is forecasting 8.8%.
But it is possible that we could see 8% by the election. It depends on job creation and the participation rate...
If the participation rate falls to 63.5%, the economy needs to add 74 thousand jobs per month for the unemployment rate to fall to 8%. But a further decline in the participation rate would not be good news. I expect the participation rate to increase if the economy improves at all.
Most likely I think the participation rate will be in the 64.0% to 64.5% range next November. That would mean the economy would need to add somewhere between 167,000 and 260,000 jobs per month. The bottom end of that range seems possible with sluggish growth, but the top end is less likely.
source and chart
But it is possible that we could see 8% by the election. It depends on job creation and the participation rate...
If the participation rate falls to 63.5%, the economy needs to add 74 thousand jobs per month for the unemployment rate to fall to 8%. But a further decline in the participation rate would not be good news. I expect the participation rate to increase if the economy improves at all.
Most likely I think the participation rate will be in the 64.0% to 64.5% range next November. That would mean the economy would need to add somewhere between 167,000 and 260,000 jobs per month. The bottom end of that range seems possible with sluggish growth, but the top end is less likely.
source and chart
Labels:
unemployment rate
| Reactions: |
Monday, December 12, 2011
Paying For Financial Advice

A quick review of each shows their strengths and weaknesses.
2% & 20% is primarily used by hedge funds. You pay a hefty premium plus one fifth of your profits for the privilege (many funds have an extended lock up period as well). Unfortunately, performance at funds has been lacking.
Bottom line: Top managers earn their fees, but the rest, not so much. If your manager(s) are making you outsized profits and avoiding the crackups, stay with them. Otherwise, rethink the fees you pay for under-performance
Commission driven is my least favorite of all the structures. Fees tend towards 4 or 5%, as brokers must constantly spin assets to generate revenue.
Bottomline: I simply do not understand how this business continues to exist . . .
Percentage basis is my preference how to conduct fin planning (and how I do my asset management work); Adviser is on the same side of the table as the client — no commissions, no compromised payments, no legal kickbacks from 3rd parties. If I am doing my job, I am helping clients plan for the future, avoid major drawdowns where possible, and capture upside.
Bottomline: Work with someone you are comfortable with to develop a plan for you; you should be able to tap someone for advice on a wide range of finance related issues. Your job is to manage someone else who does the day to day work.
Flat rate is a business model that I believe warrants further exploration. It has typically been used for accounts sized under $500k; Numerous firms offer this; they all seem bedeviled by under-performance and de minimus customer service. I believe this is an area that has potential for huge growth if someone can figure out a way to radically improve the performance problem.
Bottomline: One day . . .
Do it yourself is something I have long advocated for, but with some caveats: Dollar cost averaging into a handful of broad indices on a monthly basis is how you start; overlay a risk management approach (like the 10 month moving average) and you are onto something very doable. The downside is your own cognitive biases, the tendency to be overwhelmed by the daily noise, and a lack of discipline in following through on your own plan.
Bottomline: Very doable if you know who you are and have the ability to follow through.
Labels:
personal finance
| Reactions: |
San Francisco: $10 Minimum Wage
Come New Year's Day, he'll have a few more coins in his pocket as San Francisco makes history by becoming the first city in the nation to scale a $10 minimum wage. The city's hourly wage for its lowest-paid workers will hit $10.24, more than $2 above the California minimum wage and nearly $3 more than the working wage set by the federal government.
source
source
Labels:
minimum wage,
San Francisco
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Cartoon: Warren Buffett and Tax Rates
Labels:
cartoon,
Dilbert,
marginal tax rates,
Warren Buffett
| Reactions: |
Monday, December 5, 2011
Friday, December 2, 2011
November Unemployment: 8.6%
The number of unemployed people fell from 13.9 million in October to 13.3 million in November while the labor force shrank from 154.2 million to 153.9 million, so, it was a combination of these two factors that drove the jobless rate lower. The broader U6 measure of under-employment (including discouraged workers and those settling for part-time work) fell from 16.2 percent to 15.6 percent.
source
Labels:
unemployment,
unemployment rate
| Reactions: |
November Unemployment: 8.6%


There were only 120,000 jobs added in November. There were 140,000 private sector jobs added, and 20,000 government jobs lost.
The change in total employment was revised up for September and October. "The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for September was revised from +158,000 to +210,000, and the change for October was revised from +80,000 to +100,000."
U-6, an alternate measure of labor underutilization that includes part time workers and marginally attached workers, declined to 15.6% - this remains very high. U-6 was in the 8% range in 2007.
Labels:
unemployment,
unemployment rate
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










source














